hermodynamic, amine-free
CO₂ capture for heavy industry

Tree Capture captures CO₂ from concentrated industrial flue gas and compresses it to a transportable, high-purity fluid in a single integrated step. No solvent chemistry. No amine degradation. No hazardous handling. ~50% lower cost than the conventional amine reference.

~50% lower cost than conventional amine (MEA) capture
>95% of CO₂ fed to unit captured
99%+ output purity
>10% CO₂ concentration — the operational envelope

Amine-Free Carbon Capture

What Tree Capture does differently

Conventional carbon capture uses liquid amine solvents. They degrade, they consume large amounts of heat to regenerate, they produce hazardous waste, and they create a significant permitting liability for any operator that relies on them.

Tree Capture takes a thermodynamic approach. The process uses the physical properties of CO₂ under pressure — not chemical reactions with a solvent — to capture and separate it from flue gas. The result is a compressed, high-purity CO₂ stream ready for transport and storage, produced at materially lower cost with a fraction of the operational complexity.

Because the unit is standardised rather than bespoke, it deploys across cement, iron and steel, FCC refining, and lime without redesigning the engineering each time. One approach. Multiple high-value sectors.

Why the amine approach has reached its limits

  • ~€80/t cost of capture for cement — the European reference
  • Heavy energy penalty from solvent regeneration heat
  • Amine degradation and emissions — growing permitting liability
  • Hazardous chemical storage and make-up requirement
  • Complex, site-specific engineering — slow and expensive
The cost case: At €90/t carbon price today — and rising toward €150/t — Tree's ~€40/t capture cost is already below the cost of emitting. The economics are compelling now, not contingent on policy.

Performance — Modelled, SINTEF Validated

Technical Performance

All performance data is independently validated at lab scale by SINTEF — the same organisation that produced the CEMCAP benchmark used as the amine reference.

Parameter Tree Capture Conventional Amine (MEA Reference)
Cost of capture (cement) ~€40/t — ~50% lower ~€80/t (CEMCAP reference)
CO₂ capture efficiency >95% 85–90%
Output purity >99% 95–99% (with full post-processing)
Amine use None MEA or advanced amine solvents throughout
Permitting risk Materially lower Amine emissions = growing regulatory liability
Unit design Standardised, multi-sector Site-specific, custom engineering
CO₂ streams addressed ≥10% concentration Optimised for dilute streams

¹ Modelled cost of CO₂ avoided vs CEMCAP MEA reference. ² Modelled; to be validated at IFCEM demonstration. Independent validation by SINTEF.

WHY NOW

Regulation has made capture unavoidable.
The economics already work.

CBAM — Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

Prices the embedded carbon in goods imported into the EU. Emissions can no longer be relocated to a jurisdiction with weaker carbon pricing. Industrial operators face the same carbon cost wherever they produce.

ETS Free Allowances Ending

The free allowances that shielded EU heavy industry from the full carbon price are being phased out. Installations increasingly pay the full cost to emit — on a published, predictable schedule.

A Rising, Predictable Carbon Price

~€90/t today. Widely expected to rise toward €150/t. Tree's capture cost of ~€40/t is already below today's carbon price. The gap widens every year. This is demand-pull, not technology-push.

The Commercial Case in One Line

At €90/t carbon price and ~€40/t capture cost, Tree Capture is already cheaper than emitting — before the carbon price rises further.

Cost of emitting (carbon price) €90/t
Tree Capture cost ~€40/t
Saving per tonne ~€50/t

Business Model

Feasibility → Demonstration → EPC → MRV

A staged, capital-light pathway. Each stage qualifies, de-risks, and funds the next. The MRV platform is the venture-scale layer — recurring,

carbon-indexed, with software-like economics.

01

Feasibility Study

Paid, site-specific study. First revenue. Qualifies and scopes the site for demonstration. Entry point for the customer relationship.

First Revenue
02

On-site Demonstrator

Modular Tree Capture unit on the live industrial site. Proves real-world performance. IFCEM is this stage — operational now.

De-risks the Site
03

EPC-Built Installation

An EPC partner and project finance carry the full-scale build. Tree Associates remains capital-light while the full-scale asset operates.

Capital-Light
04

MRV Platform

Measurement, Reporting and Validation. A recurring, carbon-indexed annuity on every installation. Revenue grows with the carbon price.

Recurring Revenue

Why the MRV platform matters: The platform holds each operator's compliance evidence chain for EU ETS, CBAM and CRCF requirements. Replacing it means re-papering regulatory compliance. That structural switching cost, combined with revenue indexed to a rising carbon price, creates software-like economics at scale.

Start with a Feasability Study

The entry point is a paid, site-specific feasibility study. If your facility sits in the ≥10% CO₂ stream envelope — cement, steel, FCC, or lime — get in touch.